Crossbreeds (even the odd ones) are often considered healthier and live longer than purebred dogs. However, they may not be the ideal choice many people think. That’s according to a study by the Royal Veterinary College (RVC), which dispels some deeply rooted myths.
The study, the largest ever of its kind, looked at three popular crossbreeds: the Cockapoo, the Labradoodle and the Cavapoo. The researchers analysed data from 9,402 dog owners in the UK, comparing the health of the mixed breeds with that of their parent breeds (Cocker Spaniels, Labrador Retrievers, King Charles Spaniels and Poodles).
The results revealed that, in 86.8% of the 57 common health problems studied, there were no significant differences between the mixed breeds and the purebreds. In cases where there were discrepancies (13.4%), mixed breeds actually had a higher or lower risk to the same extent than their parent breeds.
However, some interesting data emerged from the study. All three types of crossbreed showed a higher predisposition to ear infections, while Cockapoos were more prone to skin problems than their parent breeds. On the other hand, both Labradoodles and Cockapoos showed a lower risk of patellar luxation.
Gina Bryson, lead author of the study, highlighted the importance of debunking unfounded prejudices against both purebreds and mixed breeds, placing the emphasis on the overall welfare of dogs. Owner responsibility and breeding practices, guided by solid scientific evidence, should be the top priority.
Who knows if the reality is also the same with felines, of which this hybrid specimen is the only one in the world.
This article is originally published on tech.everyeye.it
